Candidate Assessment Date for Public Announcement No. 02-100/26-2922/2 for the Needs of the State Property Administration

We hereby inform you that the assessment of the knowledge, abilities, competencies and skills of candidates who meet the requirements of Public Announcement No. 02-100/26-2922/2, published by the Human Resources Administration on 16 September 2026 for the needs of the State Property Administration, for the position of Officer – Sector for the Maintenance of State Property and Provision of Services in State Authorities’ Buildings and Representative Buildings – Department for Capital and Routine Maintenance of State Property, will be held on 5 [date incomplete]. The practical task will be assessed according to the following criteria: structure of the written work, systematic presentation of information, clarity and precision of written expression, use of appropriate terminology, and problem-solving ability. Candidates who achieve more than 50% of the points on the practical task, or candidates who receive a “satisfactory” rating in the assessment of typing, computer skills or a foreign language (if the announcement requires specific knowledge and skills), may proceed to the oral interview. During the oral interview for positions in the executive and expert staff categories, the following general competencies will be assessed: oral communication, commitment to learning and development, and cooperation. For positions in the expert-management staff category, in addition to the general competencies, managerial competencies will also be assessed, namely the ability to organize work and manage human resources and the ability to exercise strategic management. Only a candidate from the List of Candidates who meet the requirements of the announcement may participate in the assessment procedure, as follows: Note: before the written test begins, candidates must present their identity card or another identity document bearing a photograph to the Commission for identity verification.

This article was collected and archived by Digital Sovereignty Watch from an institutional or public source relevant to digital sovereignty, technology policy, cybersecurity, cloud services, artificial intelligence or European regulation.

Read original source