Candidate Assessment Date for Advertisement No. 02-100/26-1090/3 for the Needs of the Basic State Prosecutor’s Office in Plav

We hereby inform you that the assessment of the knowledge, abilities, competencies, and skills of candidates who meet the requirements of public advertisement No. 02-100/26-1090/3, published by the Human Resources Administration on May 8, 2026, for the needs of the Basic State Prosecutor’s Office in Plav, for the position of Senior Administrative Officer I, Courier-Driver, within the General and Administrative Affairs Service, will be held on November 4, 2026. Each correct answer is worth one point, meaning that the maximum score on the general test for each individual competency is 15 points. The practical task will be assessed according to the following criteria: structure of the written work, systematic presentation of information, clarity and precision of written expression, use of appropriate terminology, and problem-solving ability. Candidates who achieve more than 50% of the points on the practical task, as well as candidates who receive a “satisfactory” rating in the assessment of typing, computer skills, or a foreign language (if the advertisement requires specific knowledge and skills), may proceed to the oral interview. During the oral interview, the following general competencies will be assessed for positions in the executive and expert staff categories: oral communication, learning and development orientation, and cooperation. For positions in the expert-management staff category, in addition to the general competencies, the following managerial competencies will also be assessed: ability to organize work and manage human resources, and strategic management ability. Only candidates from the list of candidates who meet the requirements of the advertisement may participate in the assessment procedure. Note: Before the written test begins, candidates must present an identity card or another identity document with a photograph to the Commission for identity verification.

This article was collected and archived by Digital Sovereignty Watch from an institutional or public source relevant to digital sovereignty, technology policy, cybersecurity, cloud services, artificial intelligence or European regulation.

Read original source